Higher ed solidarity, please!

Last week, the Trump administration sent to nine universities A Compact for Excellence in Higher Education, the idea being that institutions that sign on to the compact would receive “preferential access to federal funds.” This is the latest effort by Trump to gain control over higher ed, which is part of the larger project of commandeering American culture on behalf of MAGA values – i.e., white, male, Christian-nationalist dominance. (That, at any rate, is the project of Trump’s “handlers.” I suspect that for Trump himself, like everything else, it has to do with power, revenge, and adulation.)

The compact itself is of course a wolf barely in sheep’s clothing, a grab bag of right-wing fantasies about how to reshape universities and to indoctrinate students in MAGA jingoism. Many have already condemned it, including the American Council of Learned Societies.

Predictably, the University of Texas board – the MAGAist of boards appointed by the MAGAist of governors in one of the MAGAist of states – has expressed enthusiasm for the compact. It is a real tragedy to watch Texas, with its host of fine institutions, go the way of Florida in ransacking higher education.

Whether any of the other nine institutions follows suit remains to be seen. That list comprises Brown, Dartmouth, MIT, Arizona, Penn, USC, Virginia, and Vanderbilt. Frankly, if any of these institutions caves, it will signal something very bad. We’re at a tipping point, with some recent stiffening of the backbone of American higher ed, in the face of Trump’s assaults; we cannot afford backsliding.

Indeed, as Johns Hopkins political scientist Henry Farrell points out in today’s New York Times: the administration with this move “wanted to signal strength. Instead, it’s revealing its weakness. The administration’s need to break the academy is forcing it to make a desperately risky gamble.” He elaborates:

The administration would have played its cards differently if it had a stronger hand. Its best outcome would have been a private deal under which the nine universities announced simultaneously that they were signing onto the compact. Such an announcement might indeed have panicked other universities around the country.

That this didn’t happen suggests that the administration’s threats aren’t enough on their own to compel submission.

Farrell’s larger point is this: authoritarians seek to gain control of civil society through threats, intimidation, selective use of force that “divide and conquer” any opposition. But if enough of the public and institutions of civil society hang together against the threats, no authoritarian can ultimately overcome them.

So please, Brown et al., stay solid!

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | 2 Comments

Tim Snyder on Stalinism and Stephen Miller (video)

And here is Tim Snyder’s take on Stephen Miller on Substack …

https://open.substack.com/pub/snyder/p/stalinism-and-stephen-miller-video?utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=email

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Stephen Miller’s agenda of hate

Stephen Miller is a real conveyor of hate in the administration…. Here is Jennifer Rubin’s take on Substack ….

https://open.substack.com/pub/contrarian/p/stephen-miller-is-the-poster-boy?utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=email

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Whispering in the Storm

The daily nightmares continue. There are reasons for hope – more on that another time. But there continue to be reasons to fear, perhaps most significant among them is that the more Trump feels cornered, the more desperate his actions become. Now we have his manic and maniacal response to the shutdown, which he is using — with Russell Vought at the helm – as a DOGE 2.0 moment to further destroy American institutions and to punish his enemies (note his selective cancellations of federal grants to state projects). The lying with which he and his minions speak about these actions has reached a new – and more illegal – level: sending messages to federal employees and posting on government websites that “the radical Democrats” are responsible for the shutdown, in complete violation of the Hatch Act. And as Dan noted in recent posts, his rhetoric essentially designating all Democrats and liberals as “the enemy within” is not new theme of his dictatorial militarization of American life.

So far, the polls on the shutdown appear to show that most people accept the Democrats’ narrative that Trump and the Republicans are responsible. Still, I can’t help feeling that, yet again, the Democratic leadership is missing a huge opportunity. The progressive communications strategist Anat Shenker-Osario has this to say:

“Healthcare is essential, to state the obvious. But focusing in on negotiating over restoring subsidies is sending the message that this is a normal administration. That we have policy disagreements and not that we are confronting a regime hell bent on destroying us….So, if you believe as I do, and as scholars of authoritarianism counsel, that sustained widespread mobilizing is essential – you use every opportunity to say ‘we will not be complicit in MAGA’s attack on Americans.'” (fuller quote here)

This is an opportunity to say to the American people that it is not possible to negotiate in good faith with a corrupt government, and to proceed to call out many more of the ways in which Trump and Company are cheating regular Americans to line their own pockets and those of their billionaire allies.

Hakeem Jeffries mumbled around some of this on Morning Joe today, and it was as forceful as a whisper in a storm. Maybe it’s time for Bernie to give public speaking lessons. But what the Dems really need is a forceful, active – not reactive – vision. One approach to that suggested here.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Grounds for impeachment

In his speech to the top officers of the United States military Donald Trump has crossed the line from reckless right-wing authoritarian politician to aspiring fascist dictator. Here are some crucial excerpts from Amy Wang’s reporting at the Washington Post.


In his speech to top military leaders, President Donald Trump escalated his rhetoric against the “radical left,” repeatedly calling the group “the enemy within” and insisting that he should be able to use military force in American cities.

“I told [Defense Secretary] Pete [Hegseth] we should use some of these dangerous cities as training grounds for our military National Guard. But military, because we’re going into Chicago,” Trump said Tuesday at Quantico, referring to his efforts to deploy military to blue cities and states “to keep domestic order and peace.”

Though Trump has, in recent months, frequently attacked blue cities and states, it was the first time he directly addressed military leaders and told them they would be “a major part” of fighting a “war from within” in cities such as San Francisco, Chicago, New York and Los Angeles.

“We’ve brought back the fundamental principle that defending the homeland is the military’s first and most important priority. That’s what it is,” Trump said. “Only in recent decades that politicians somehow come to believe that our job is to police the far reaches of Kenya and Somalia, while America is under invasion from within. We’re under invasion from within. No different than a foreign enemy, but more difficult in many ways because they don’t wear uniforms — at least when they’re wearing a uniform, you can take them out. These people don’t have uniforms, but we are under invasion from within, and we’re stopping it very quickly.”


Dangerous cities … enemy within … invasion from within … demonization of the “radical left” … This is not the language of an American president who is committed to democracy, constitution, equal rights, and the rule of law. This is not the language of a president who respects the idea of a non-political military. It is not the language of a president who respects the rights of citizens to assemble, to protest, to express their values and their opposition in a peaceful manner. It is rather the language of a Mussolini in Italy, a Pinochet in Chile, or a Juan Carlos Ongania in Argentina in 1966.

And who is the “radical left” to whom Trump refers? It seems to be any person or group who disagrees with the MAGA agenda, who objects to Trump’s lawlessness, who rejects the racism and cruelty of his anti-immigration crusade — in short, anyone who is not MAGA. Are reporters next? What about critical bloggers and Youtube hosts or podcasters? What about leaders of civil rights organizations who object to the explicit racism of ICE profiling on the streets of Chicago or Los Angeles? And how about Democrat senators and congressmen and women who oppose Trump’s plans? Are these the “radical left” that Trump wants to wage war against? Is James Comey just the first high-profile persecution by Trump’s Department of Justice that we will see? Are we talking detention camps for liberals? Are we thinking of firing professors whose courses mention racism and slavery?

We have a constitution, and it is very clear about our fundamental rights — rights of freedom of speech, conscience, association, and habeas corpus, and yes, citizenship by birthright. The president demonstrates that he has no respect or adherence to the principles and values that are embodied in our constitution and our system of law.

The president’s threats about waging war against “internal enemies” and using the military to conduct such an assault should be the basis for impeachment. These threats demonstrate a fundamental disregard and disloyalty to our most basic principles of freedom and equality. This shouldn’t be a political party issue; it concerns the loyalty of the president to the constitution of the United States, and the oath he took when he assumed office. Articles of impeachment now!

[I sent this as a letter to Congresswoman Dingell as well.]

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | 1 Comment

The Washington Post Trump defends using troops to police U.S. cities in address to military leaders

This is fundamentally chilling — it is the language of a fascist dictator. Trump speaks to the top officers of the United States armed forces of his plans to use the military against “the enemy within”. This is the language of Mussolini, Pinochet, and Juan Carlos Ongania. It should be the bipartisan basis of impeachment of the president.

Trump defends using troops to police U.S. cities in address to military leaders

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2025/09/30/trump-hegseth-generals-meeting-live/

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Take care of our city, our country — and one another

Take care of our city, our country — and one another

A beautiful short piece about “taking care of each other” by Colbert King in the Washington Post this morning … a great description of civic friendship in difficult times. The closing words —

My time has come, but as Daddy said, “Take care.” Despite all that the dark forces of regression seek to do, hold fast. Embrace and defend the Constitution. And, I’m bound by my faith to say, cling to and draw strength from the Scriptures.

I believe, as an article of faith, that despite the work of Trump and his disciples, wrong will be righted in the end.

Even at this late hour, there’s time for forgiveness, and hope that justice will prevail.

Take care of our country.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2025/09/26/colbert-king-final-column-trump-america/

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Two crises

I’ve been thinking about our discussion last night, which was a very good one.

One thing that became more clear for me is that we face two existential crises in the United States, not just one. Most visibly, we witness daily the extension of lawlessness and authoritarian use of power by our Federal administration. So we are rightly concerned and anxious about the destruction of our democratic institutions and our rights as free citizens.

Also highly visible, and intertwined with the first crisis, is the rise and spread of hate-based activism, white supremacy, anti-Semitism, anti-Muslim bigotry, hatred of immigrants, and punitive antagonism to non-conformant people along lines of gender and sexuality. We see evidence daily of young people being radicalized along the lines of right-wing extremism, with neo-Nazi groups and other extremist rallying calls finding increasing support. (Recent reports indicate that Discord has become an important hub for right-wing radicalization of teenagers.) As documented by the Southern Poverty Law Center (link), hate groups are gaining followers and finding new ways of advancing their goals.

As citizens of a democracy based on equality, we are faced with two fundamental challenges: to resist the encroachment of governmental lawlessness and authoritarian measures; and to find ways of reducing the potency of hate-based recruitment and to increase the resilience of the majority of us against hate in our communities.

Several avenues seem especially promising in response to the threat of hate-based mobilization. One is the role played by community-based organizations that have presence across communities and that convey the values and messages of equality, toleration, and trust across groups. A good example in Michigan is ACCESS, a civic organization based in Dearborn that has consistently advocated for cross-community friendship and partnership and has advanced the values of community solidarity across lines of religion, ethnicity, and race. Organizations like ACCESS can be an important line of defense against extremism, and they can have positive effects on the young people in the various communities they embrace.

A second avenue is the language and actions of our political leaders. We need political leaders who speak passionately and truthfully about the values of a multi-racial, multi-ethnic, multi-religious community. I am an admirer of Debbie Dingell. But I think she and her colleagues — including the rare Republican who still believes in political and civil equality — need to be using their skills to communicate the democratic values of mutual acceptance and respect that our democracy depends upon. I think Obama succeeded in doing that; but it is hard to think of members of Congress who have devoted much of themselves to combatting hate. Hate is a cancer for a multi-cultural democracy. This is a tricky path to tread, because it must be done honestly and without stridency — more in the voice of Lincoln than Huey Long.

A third avenue involves all of us. We can all make clear in our behavior and our conversations that inter-group hatred is fundamentally destructive — both to individuals and to our democratic polity itself. One of quotations Gary distributed on the table last night rang a bell for me. It is the words of Martin Luther King, Jr.:

I have decided to stick with love. Hate is too great a burden to bear.

A phrase that captures the view of “a free community of equals” that seems especially powerful to me is the idea of “civic friendship”. Can we cultivate civic friendship on a mass scale?

A few years ago I had my own dream of a more just America. I imagined an alternative future for Florida through the thought of a progressive centrist governor who found a way to unite the state around a shared vision:

It could have been different. In an alternate universe Florida might have had a centrist governor who actively and eloquently endorsed the pluralism and diversity of the third largest state in the country.

“All of us — black, white, brown, Asian, Christian, Muslim, Jewish, straight, and gay — all of us constitute the dynamism and creativity of our state. Our history has sometimes been ugly, and acts and practices of racism are part of that history. We need to honestly confront our past, and we need to move forward with commitment and confidence in the strength of a diverse society. As your governor I will work every day toward ensuring equality, dignity, and participation of every member of our society. That is my pledge to you, my fellow Floridians.”

This is a winning formula for democracy, and it is a winning formula for a political party. In this alternate universe, Florida could play a key role in creating a democratic and dynamic south. But sadly, no red state seems ready for this transformation of their politics and culture.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | 1 Comment

Right-wing extremist violence is more frequent and more deadly

The reckless and dangerous claims by administration leaders, including Stephen Miller, that a vast leftist conspiracy is committing most political violence are another MAGA fabrication …. Here are the data.

Right-wing extremist violence is more frequent and more deadly

https://theconversation.com/right-wing-extremist-violence-is-more-frequent-and-more-deadly-than-left-wing-violence-what-the-data-shows-265367?utm_medium=article_clipboard_share&utm_source=theconversation.com

Posted in Uncategorized | 6 Comments

Free Speech Under Assault

The Trump Administration is engaged in a concerted campaign against Americans’ First Amendment free speech rights. Free speech is a core democratic value, directly related to human dignity, to human progress, and to the full exercise of citizenship. It is not without reason that free speech is ensconced at the beginning of the Bill of Rights. It is also worth noting that the Constitution might well not have been ratified had there not been an understanding that a bill of rights would be added. James Madison, sometimes called “the Father of the Constitution,” was a committed advocate of the bill of rights and the drafter of the amendments. When Trump and company attack free speech, they are assaulting one of the most fundamental principles of a free people.

The rapidity and sweeping nature of the attack is stunning. There is not enough space here even to touch on all of its dimensions. The catalyst, of course, is the assassination of Charlie Kirk, whose death has magically transubstantiated many on the Right who prided themselves on so-called free speech absolutism (often very shallow in form) into sudden advocates for the elimination of “hate speech” (which has long been constitutionally protected speech) . . . about Charlie Kirk. The breadth of speech that they sweep into that category is staggering — all truth be damned. And the consequences are devastating. Here is an article in The Chronicle of Higher Education that catalogs employees and students at universities and colleges who have been disciplined or suspended.  And that is just higher education.

The highest-profile case is, of course, ABC’s rapid suspension of Jimmy Kimmel, following threats by the chair of the Federal Communications Commission, Brendan Carr. Barb and I have joined the boycott and cancelled our Disney/ABC subscriptions (fortunately, we finished Andor just in time). And this is what we sent to ABC:

I am beyond disgusted that ABC has bowed to pressure from the Trump Administration and pulled Jimmy Kimmel’s show, following a statement he made on his show about the alleged shooter of Charlie Kirk and the MAGA reaction to it.  My wife and I have cancelled our subscriptions until Jimmie Kimmel is restored to the air.

FCC Chair Brendan Carr accused Kimmel of “lying,” said that you should remove him, and said it could be done “the easy way or the hard way.”

(1) Mr. Kimmel’s statement was wholly within the bounds of legitimate public discourse, even if a part of it later turned out to be incorrect based on new information.  In any case, it clearly qualifies as protected speech under the First Amendment. If the government had acted directly against Kimmel for his comments, it would be a crystal clear violation of his Constitutional rights. DO NOT DO THE GOVERNMENT’S DIRTY WORK FOR IT! That was a common tactic during the McCarthy Era: non-governmental organizations persecuting speech and speakers based on government pressure. YOU ARE HELPING DRAG US INTO A NEW MCCARTHYISM.

(2) The government DID threaten Disney/ABC directly when Carr made his threat about “doing it the easy way or the hard way.” If he acted on that threat, it would surely violate the First Amendment. Uttering the threat is in itself suspect: it is an act that chills discourse. STAND UP FOR YOUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AND THE PRINCIPLES OF FREE SPEECH, WHICH ARE AT THE HEART OF YOUR INDUSTRY AND WHICH ARE ESSENTIAL TO A DEMOCRACY.

(3) Carr accused Kimmel of “lying.” What ABC appears to be indicating is that the FCC Chair and his boss, President Trump, are the arbiters of both truth and people’s intention.  IN THAT CASE, YOU HAVE ABDICATED YOUR PUBLIC TRUST. 

(4) Public figures and institutions have demonstrated that when you stand up to the Trump Administration, you win: Governor Pritzker, Harvard University, the AP, numerous federal employees, etc. JOIN THE RANKS OF THE COURAGEOUS, NOT THE COWARDS.

(5) Trump is on a tear to destroy the First Amendment and turn federal powers against his enemies. UNLESS YOU CHANGE COURSE, YOU WILL GO DOWN IN HISTORY AS AMONG THE COLLABORATORS WHO ENDED DEMOCRACY.

Please act quickly. Much more than your salaries and assets are at stake. Your Hulu/Fubo merger approval will mean nothing in a tyranny.

Michael Tomasky in The New Republic explains why this situation is so important. And here is AOC on the floor of the House today, speaking against a resolution to “honor the life and legacy of Charlie Kirk.” And, a good analysis of the first-amendment issues here.

We are in dark times indeed, but people are still working to speak truth to power.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment