A submission of facts to a candid world (Declaration musings I) (Gary Krenz)

Happy New Year! Tomorrow we enter the year of the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence. There will be much to review and discuss about America’s Revolution (I haven’t watched the Ken Burns documentary yet but look forward to it); the meaning of our Declaration and both the ideals and shortcomings that it contains; the ups and downs of our two-and-a-half-century national history; and how these things bear on our current situation. 

So, I would like, today and tomorrow, to undertake a little exercise with respect to the Declaration. Today, I take it up as a kind of template for mapping the incredibly disturbing actions of Trump and his minions over this year—a year of anti-Revolution, of Reaction, in many ways unprecedented. Tomorrow, I would like to reflect on some things we might say about the renewal and extension of the Declarations ideals that I hope 2026 will afford us.

One of the remarkable aspects of the Declaration is that it presents an argument, impelled by “decent respect to the opinions of mankind,” to justify the independence of the American colonies. Its list of grievances against King George III provides our template. Here I give the Declaration’s text in black, followed by my annotations in blue:

  • He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good. Is there any law or court order that Trump won’t violate, if he thinks it will be to his gain? The emoluments clause of the Constitution, the posse comitatus act, and the set of acts specifically constraining the president in firing of federal employees particularly come to mind.
  • He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them. Substitute “Republicans in Congress” for “his Governors,” and could you have a better depiction of Trump’s relationship with the Legislative Branch? Fortunately, we are seeing some cracks in this MAGA monolith, as Trump’s popularity sinks and his temporizing regarding the Epstein files becomes more exasperating.
  • He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only. Trump & Co. have specifically targeted for retribution “blue cities” and Democratic states in any number of ways, most notably ICE operations and National Guard deployments.
  • He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures. The Administration’s gutting of public records and DOGE’s hatchet job on federal agencies, dramatically compromising their ability to gather information, have an analogous effect. 
  • He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people. See above: for all intents and purposes, the Republicans have almost totally abrogated Congress’s constitutional responsibilities. Mike Johnson’s adjourning of the House to avoid a vote on the Epstein files is a case in point.
  • He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands. Need we say more? There is no doubt that the US needed a revised immigration policy (and no doubt that the Republicans at Trump’s behest killed a bipartisan bill aiming for exactly that). But Trump is essentially destroying immigration wholesale (except for white South Africans) without concern about the impact on human lives or on our workforce.
  • He has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary powers. To be sure, we can go back to Mitch McConnell’s unconscionable prevention of consideration of Merrick Garland’s appointment to the Supreme Court, and we’re seeing the ramifications of that in the far-right ideology of a significant portion of the court. In his first term, Republicans and Trump’s SCOTUS nominees made a mockery of the confirmation process. In this year, Pam Bondi has all but decimated the Justice Department and weaponized it against Trump’s enemies, while Kash Patel has wreaked havoc on the FBI.
  • He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries. In this year, Trump’s Administration has dragged its feet on any number of judicial orders, has actively defied others, and has quoted Andrew Jackson to the effect that the courts have no way to enforce their edicts, implying that they need not be followed. Worst of all, SCOTUS has given the president wide-ranging immunity and has almost always ruled — often on the shadow docket — to promote the so-called unitary executive theory. Trump’s “Will” — which is much more id than ego — has broad scope.
  • He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass our people, and eat out their substance. ICE, ICE, ICE; DOGE, DOGE, DOGE.
  • He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures. As noted above, National Guard and US Military deployments in violation of posse comitatus, based on fabrication of facts on the ground. 
  • He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power. ICE, again, which is ever more brazen in its assaults, without any due process. Also, the unjustified, probably illegal, and certainly immoral strikes on Venezuelan boats.
  • He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation: Without attention to established authorities, Trump willy-nilly and unilaterally enacts irreversible damage, such as the destruction of the people’s East Wing of the White House.
  • For Quartering large bodies of armed troops among us: Unwarranted National Guard deployments and the establishment, for all intents and purposes, of ICE “bases” in targeted locations, over the objections of state governors and mayors.
  • For protecting them, by a mock Trial, from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States: ICE is completely unaccountable. Trump pardoned nearly 1600 January 6 insurrectionists — some of whom have been rearrested for other crimes. 
  • For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world: Trump has implemented indiscriminate tariffs and launched a set of trade wars, most of which have not gone well for the US. If we extend the idea of trade to include all forms of US intercourse with the world, we are witnessing a wholesale abandonment of any effort to play a stabilizing force in world affairs.
  • For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent: Tariffs are, of course, a kind of tax and were implemented without any legislative action.
  • For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury: See all of the references throughout these annotations to lack of due process.
  • For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences: Numerous immigrants have been deported to countries other than those of their origins, against their consent, without due process, and in many cases in direct violation of court orders.
  • For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies: OK, maybe not a neighboring province, but now, sadly, several US provinces, e.g., Florida, Texas, Missouri are in the lead on implementing the MAGA agenda and are willing co-conspirators in Trump’s efforts to steal the midterms through gerrymandering.
  • For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws, and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments: Just read Project 2025. This is the absolute goal of those behind Trump who are leveraging his narcissism for their own efforts to remake America in the image of Christian Nationalism, including the subjugation of women.
  • For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever. See above, esp. “Mike Johnson.”
  • He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us. Trump is President-as-Divider: he does not even pretend to be the president of the American people but constantly rages against those who oppose him. He enacts retribution against anyone he perceives as his enemy — e.g., James Comey, Letitia James, Adam Schiff, Elissa Slotkin, Mark Kelly, and more. He targets blue states for punishment and red states for reward.
  • He has plundered our seas, ravaged our Coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people. Too much to say here, but look at the decimation of environmental protections; the joke that RFK, Jr. has made of HHS; the undercutting of FEMA; the destruction of the national research infrastructure; the attack, in league with his oligarchic buddies, on a free press; his destruction of the East Wing of the White House without proper review and authorization; his unlawful foisting of his own name onto institutions such as the Kennedy Center; and on and on.
  • He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation. While Trump has not engaged “large Armies” of foreign mercenaries, he has engaged foreign governments in his wholesale and illegal deportation of immigrants without due process. He has effectively “mercenerized,” if you’ll forgive the term, US foreign policy, especially with respect to (1) Ukraine, where he seems hell-bent on pleasing Putin for his own egotistical and lucrative gains, and (2) Gaza, where he sees not a repressed, suffering people but a real estate development opportunity.
  • He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands. Finally, we might say, a complaint without a clear analogy. Comments to the contrary are welcome.
  • He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages, whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions. Sadly the reference to Native Americans is, of course, the most disturbing utterance of our Declaration: out of sync with the ideal of human equality which frames the whole, and completely conditioned by what would later come to be known as “Manifest Destiny.” Of course, any acknowledgments of such shortcomings is deemed by Trump and MAGA as “woke,” anti-white ideology.
    That said, clearly the first clause is fully applicable: “exciting domestic insurrection” is Trump’s middle name. 

If you are a close reader of the Declaration, you will have realized that there is one grievance that I omitted. In include it here:

  • He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions [of legislative bodies], to cause others to be elected; whereby the Legislative powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within. [Emphasis added.]

As we look to 2026, let us take hope from the ways we the people have risen up to assert those “Legislative powers” that are “incapable of Annihilation.” More on that tomorrow.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

The Washington Post Trump aides’ official religious messages for Christmas draw objections

More deliberate and offensive flouting of the separation of church and state by the Trump administration … Christian nationalism as a political strategy … We are a pluralistic nation with no official religious identity. This administration sounds more and more like the BJP in India.

Trump aides’ official religious messages for Christmas draw objections

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/12/26/trump-officials-religious-christmas-messages/

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Against Christian nationalism (Dan Little)

In his speech to Turning Point USA Vice President Vance affirmed belligerently that the United States was a Christian nation. MS NOW writer Erum Salam noted that

The vice president also said that ‘the only thing that has truly served as an anchor of the United States of America is that we have been, and by the grace of God we always will be, a Christian nation’ — a remark met with raucous applause.

This is outrageous for any elected official to say. Has Mr. JD Vance not acquainted himself with our US Constitution? We are not a Christian nation, any more than we are a Buddhist, Muslim, Jewish, or atheist nation. Rather, we are a constitutional republic consisting of peoples of many faiths or no religious identity at all. Our founders were very clear about this. They insisted on a firm and clear separation between church and state, they were exact about the distinction between citizen and religious believer, and they made clear that the power of the state could not be used to favor one religious identity over another.

So, no, Mr. JD Vance, we are not a Christian nation, we are not a white nation, and we are not a fascist dictatorship. We are a nation of democratic equals who must respect and engage with each other on terms of equal rights and freedoms. Stop undermining our democratic liberties!

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Trump’s Appalling Reiner Reaction Is a Sign of Something Deeply Wrong

A sane assessment from the conservative National Review of Trump’s Reiner madness …

Trump’s Appalling Reiner Reaction Is a Sign of Something Deeply Wrong

https://www.nationalreview.com/the-morning-jolt/trumps-appalling-reiner-reaction-is-a-sign-of-something-deeply-wrong/

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Trump installs critical plaques about Biden, Obama in White House | Fox News

More infantile, churlish, and undignified Trump behavior. For Fox News to call these plaques "critical" is absurd … call them schoolyard name-calling by a narcissistic bully. Caligula once again. History will not forgive this man.

Trump installs critical plaques about Biden, Obama in White House | Fox News https://share.google/GkWEVGPRInxFixrLl

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Our Caligula president (Dan Little)

Donald Trump’s actions often defy historical analogies. Recurring themes that have no precedent in US history include his transparent goal of imposing his unilateral will on our country, crushing and humiliating his perceived enemies, and defying the rule of law to prosecute a long stream of his opponents. His attempts to secure groundless indictments of mortgage fraud, treason, or lying against former officials like James Comey, John Bolton, or Letitia James are shameful and immoral acts that should be considered impeachable offenses against the duties of a president sworn to uphold the constitution. And the effort to bring court martial charges within the system of military justice against Sen. Mark Kelly is the action of a pure tyrant.

But in addition to Trump’s reckless use of the power of the state for his own personal grudges and enmities is another aspect that appears wherever he shows his hand — the underlying and unhinged cruelty that the man displays at every stage. This was nowhere more evident than in his psychopathic comments about the tragic and senseless murder of Rob and Michele Reiner. Even his supporters now seem to agree that these gloating, demeaning comments were inexcusable. Trump plainly has no capacity at all for compassion and pity for the suffering of others.

Is there a historical analogy that fits Trump’s behavior and mental world? Hitler comes to mind — armed paramilitary supporters, a racist mind and language, and contempt for law and constitution. But perhaps there is an even more suitable example if we go back to Caligula, the singularly cruel, despotic, murderous, and ultimately insane emperor of the Roman Empire (37-41 CE). Caligula who railed and conspired against the Roman senate, Caligula who delighted in humiliating and destroying his enemies, Caligula who madly declared war on the sea, … perhaps this is the historical precedent who best fits our president.

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Coin sets and white male supremacy (Gary Krenz)

Screenshot

If you would like evidence that the ultimate goal of the Trump Administration and MAGA leadership is a white-male-supremacist society, look no further than the Treasury Department’s release of designs for the US Mint coin set commemorating the nation’s 250th birthday. This has taken a truly absurdist turn.

Trump’s assault on our nation’s political, social, and cultural diversity, as well as on the historical record of our struggles to become “a more perfect union” in which the Declaration’s promise of equality is fulfilled, is of astounding, mind-numbing magnitude. Much of this assault is substantive and direct, but some of it leans more toward the symbolic (although such a distinction is problematic). The Administration has issued extensive restrictions on “woke” language (leading to the absurd redaction or near-redaction of “Enola Gay,” the plane that dropped the atomic bomb on Hiroshima, from numerous documents). It has eliminated Pride Month, Black History Month, and other commemorations from federal events. It has prohibited federal employees from including gender pronouns in email signatures. It has ordered national park gift shops to stop selling merchandise promoting DEI. It has reversed the Biden Administration’s style guidelines for using Calibri font, which makes websites more accessible for individuals with certain vision constraints.

It has, of course, done far worse than this; these are simply examples of the more . . . petty extremes to which Trump is going.

But to my mind, the new coin release is particularly revealing. Here is the New York Times report: “The War on ‘Wokeness’ Comes to the U.S. Mint.” The coin designs were announced at a Philadelphia event that sounds a bit reminiscent of a junior-high patriotic tableau from my youth. The Times reports:

Left unmentioned amid the event’s fife-and-drum pageantry was that these coins also represented a rejection of a different set of designs — meant to commemorate certain other inspiring chapters of the nation’s history, including abolition, women’s suffrage and the civil rights movement.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent made the decision to eliminate these designs, ignoring “the more diverse recommendations for the quarters by the Citizens Coinage Advisory Committee, a bipartisan group mandated by Congress to review the U.S. Mint’s proposed designs for American coins.”

Don’t worry, though, because the released set will still adhere to the legislative requirement that women’s contributions to our nation’s history be recognized: 

“The Mayflower Compact Quarter fulfills this legislative requirement,” a Mint official said in a statement. “The women of the Plymouth colony were essential for the colony’s survival by making medicines from native plants, preserving food, and educating children. It’s likely the women formed early connections with the Native American Wampanoag community, collecting knowledge about farming and food preparation.”

I pity the Mint official who was compelled to issue such a demeaning and insulting rationale — insulting not just to women, of course, but to all Americans past and present.

In what universe are the abolition of slavery, universal suffrage for women, and the civil rights movement not essential parts of our 250-year history as an independent nation?

It can only be a universe of white male supremacy. Women are allowed in only as those who helped their menfolk survive the dangers of a New England winter. Native Americans are allowed in only as the uncivilized, and thus closer-to-nature, peoples who can show the Europeans how to grow and use the foodstuffs peculiar to the New World.

And the work is not done: word is out that the Administration is planning a commemorative dollar featuring Trump’s profile — which would be the first time in our history that a living person appears on our currency. George Washington expressly rejected the idea, finding it too akin to other nations’ use of images of sitting monarchs on their coins.

The assault on diversity is an assault on democracy.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Higher education in the age of Garfield (Gary Krenz)

Here is a parochial footnote to my post on “Death By Lightning.”  As I said in that post, Garfield was intent on ending the spoils system and professionalizing the civil service. This was in line with a dramatic increase in professionalism across sectors of society. It was also in line with a more robust understanding of democracy, fueled in part by Reconstruction and the 13th, 14th, and 15th amendments to the Constitution — the second revolution, as the historian Eric Foner has said — and also by the growing labor movement, the growing women’s suffrage movement, even the increasing understanding of the natural beauty of the continent. Of course, for context we have to remember that Rutherford B. Hayes ended Reconstruction in 1877 as payoff for a remarkably cynical election deal, and that this is also the period of extended wars against Native Americans, who were struggling for their survival (the Battle of the Little Bighorn, for instance, took place in 1876, just four years before the 1880 election of Garfield)).

Still, there was a new understanding of what democracy might mean, and this was reflected in events at the University of Michigan. In 1879, James Garfield, then a Congressman from Ohio, was slated to give the commencement address at U-M. Garfield late in the day was unable to do so, and as a result, after much deliberation, the University’s President James B. Angell delivered the address. His speech stands as a manifesto for the mission of higher education and a document exemplary of the changes underway in the country at the time.

The address, “The Higher Education: A Plea for Making It Accessible to All,” makes the case for universally accessible higher education: “. . . it is of vital importance, especially in a republic, that the higher education, as well as common education, be accessible to the poor as well as the rich.” Although Angell here talks in socioeconomic terms, he is quite clear elsewhere in the address about the scope of his vision, e.g., “The son of the millionaire has no advantage over the son of the washerwoman or over the liberated slave.” And he includes women: he waged a vigorous public debate on behalf of their inclusion in higher education against the presidents of Ivy League institutions.

Angell lays out five reasons for accessible higher education:

  1. It is “due” to every child that they should have “proper facilities” for development of their “talent and character” – or as we might say, education at all levels should be a right.
  2. It is best for all of us, for society, that we cultivate knowledge wherever we can:  “We need all the intelligence, all the trained minds we can have. There is never a surplus of wisdom and true learning.”
  3. To educate the privileged only would be “to form an aristocracy of considerable strength.” If the underprivileged have access to higher education, “we have little to fear from an aristocracy of wealth.” (Wish that were enough.)
  4. We are a large and distributed nation, and we need the educated in every region and at every level of society.
  5. From time immemorial society has sought to provide to the young, without a burden on them, the education that the time demands.

These principles articulate not only a philosophy of higher education but also of the belonging of all in society that a democracy — government of the people, by the people, for the people — requires. 

Sadly, we have placed this mission for higher education in significant jeopardy, and Trumpism has done the same with the larger society.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Our American Heritage (Gary Krenz)

Barb and I just finished watching the mini-series about the assassination of President James Garfield, Death by Lightning. It’s on Netflix, and if you are able to watch it, I highly recommend it. There is much to say about it and about its applicability to our times.

The series of course takes dramatic liberties, but the fundamental story is compelling: James Garfield, a reform-minded candidate who seeks to end the spoils system that dominates Washington politics, and Charles Guiteau, a mentally disturbed supporter who longs for the grandeur of a position in the administration, are led on paths that intersect with the assassination of Garfield by Guiteau. There is great depth and understanding in this drama, and it serves as a commentary on our own times. (And the performance of Matthew MacFayden as Guiteau is remarkable.)

Here are a few of my takeaways (more to come later):

  • Garfield initiated a concerted effort to end the spoils system, which effort was then continued by his vice-president-become-president, Chester A. Arthur.
  • This led to the development of a genuine, merit-based civil service — a professionalization of of the government agencies that grew and grew into the 20th century. This professionalization aligns with that in academia, in industry, and elsewhere.
  • Garfield died — through medical malpractice following being shot, basically — a few months into his term. But his impact was significant. He is an example of what a person of good faith and genuine integrity can accomplish just by, so to speak, the aura of his effort.

Trump et al. are now trying to undo much of what Garfield started. The corruption in the current administration is truly astounding and maybe unheard of since the spoils system that Garfield fought against, if then. The attack on the so-called “Deep State” is really an attack on the professionalization of the civil service.

To be clear, there are genuine issues with respect to the relationship of the professionalized civil service to the accountability necessary to a democracy. Institutionalized expertise does in fact distance the people from many decisions the government makes. The philosopher Jürgen Habermas has been especially thoughtful about this. And one of the challenges we face is how to ensure that the people have the mechanisms to have confidence in the system.

But right now, our task is to stop the assault on a system that took a century and more to build. The Trump wrecking ball is destroying our American heritage — all why he pretends to build it up. Trump tears down the East Wing of the White House, and we have an ache in our stomachs. He lays off thousands of federal employees, and we ache for their hardships. 

What it adds up to is an assault on 150 years of our heritage: the efforts that thousands of people who, like James Garfield, worked to build a government that was transparent, honest, and oriented to the common good.

It is our obligation to stop him.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Phil Klay’s moral analysis of the boat strikes (Gary Krenz)

There was an outstanding op-ed in the NYT yesterday by Phil Klay, “What Trump Is Really Doing With His Boat Strikes.” It is a thoughtful moral analysis of a sort that we too-seldom see in the press.

Klay speaks of the Trump Administration’s “snuff films” – best label for them yet – of attacks on Venezuelan boats. And, after discussing St. Augustine’s discussion of the dangers of “the monstrous delight in cruelty,” he says this:

There are many reasons to object to the policies that the Trump administration’s videos and memes showcase. Yet the images themselves also inflict wounds, of the kind that Alypius [the subject of Augustine’s reflections] suffered when he raised his eyelids. The president inhabits a position of moral leadership. When the president and his officials sell their policies, they’re selling a version of what it means to be an American — what should evoke our love and our hate, our disgust and our delight. If all governments rest on opinion, as James Madison thought, then it is this moral shaping of the electorate that gives the president his freedom of action, and that we will still have to reckon with once he is gone.

His main point is that all of the discussion of the legalities of the “double tap,” of the strikes, of the so-called war on narcoterrorism, does not get to the underlying cost of these actions to our collective moral sense:

In lieu of careful analysis of the campaign’s legality, detailed rationales for the boat strikes and explanations of why they couldn’t be done with more traditional methods, we get Mr. Hegseth posting an image of himself with laser eyes and video after video of alleged drug traffickers being killed. The cartoon turtle is just one example in an avalanche of juvenile public messaging about those we kill. I suspect the question the administration cares about is not “is this legal,” “is this a war crime,” “is this murder” or even “is this good for America,” but rather, “isn’t this violence delightful?”

And he has this to say about the personal impact:

This wounding of the national soul is hard for me to watch. Twenty years ago, I joined the Marine Corps because I thought military service would be an honorable profession. Its honor derives from fighting prowess and adherence to a code of conduct. Military training is about character formation, with virtues taught alongside tactics. But barbaric behavior tarnishes all who wear, or once wore, the uniform, and lust for cruelty turns a noble vocation into mere thuggery. “The real evils in war,” Augustine said, “are love of violence, revengeful cruelty, fierce and implacable enmity, wild resistance, and the lust of power.” 

I highly recommend his article. We need more of this sort of articulation of moral clarity,

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment