Take care of our city, our country — and one another

Take care of our city, our country — and one another

A beautiful short piece about “taking care of each other” by Colbert King in the Washington Post this morning … a great description of civic friendship in difficult times. The closing words —

My time has come, but as Daddy said, “Take care.” Despite all that the dark forces of regression seek to do, hold fast. Embrace and defend the Constitution. And, I’m bound by my faith to say, cling to and draw strength from the Scriptures.

I believe, as an article of faith, that despite the work of Trump and his disciples, wrong will be righted in the end.

Even at this late hour, there’s time for forgiveness, and hope that justice will prevail.

Take care of our country.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2025/09/26/colbert-king-final-column-trump-america/

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Two crises

I’ve been thinking about our discussion last night, which was a very good one.

One thing that became more clear for me is that we face two existential crises in the United States, not just one. Most visibly, we witness daily the extension of lawlessness and authoritarian use of power by our Federal administration. So we are rightly concerned and anxious about the destruction of our democratic institutions and our rights as free citizens.

Also highly visible, and intertwined with the first crisis, is the rise and spread of hate-based activism, white supremacy, anti-Semitism, anti-Muslim bigotry, hatred of immigrants, and punitive antagonism to non-conformant people along lines of gender and sexuality. We see evidence daily of young people being radicalized along the lines of right-wing extremism, with neo-Nazi groups and other extremist rallying calls finding increasing support. (Recent reports indicate that Discord has become an important hub for right-wing radicalization of teenagers.) As documented by the Southern Poverty Law Center (link), hate groups are gaining followers and finding new ways of advancing their goals.

As citizens of a democracy based on equality, we are faced with two fundamental challenges: to resist the encroachment of governmental lawlessness and authoritarian measures; and to find ways of reducing the potency of hate-based recruitment and to increase the resilience of the majority of us against hate in our communities.

Several avenues seem especially promising in response to the threat of hate-based mobilization. One is the role played by community-based organizations that have presence across communities and that convey the values and messages of equality, toleration, and trust across groups. A good example in Michigan is ACCESS, a civic organization based in Dearborn that has consistently advocated for cross-community friendship and partnership and has advanced the values of community solidarity across lines of religion, ethnicity, and race. Organizations like ACCESS can be an important line of defense against extremism, and they can have positive effects on the young people in the various communities they embrace.

A second avenue is the language and actions of our political leaders. We need political leaders who speak passionately and truthfully about the values of a multi-racial, multi-ethnic, multi-religious community. I am an admirer of Debbie Dingell. But I think she and her colleagues — including the rare Republican who still believes in political and civil equality — need to be using their skills to communicate the democratic values of mutual acceptance and respect that our democracy depends upon. I think Obama succeeded in doing that; but it is hard to think of members of Congress who have devoted much of themselves to combatting hate. Hate is a cancer for a multi-cultural democracy. This is a tricky path to tread, because it must be done honestly and without stridency — more in the voice of Lincoln than Huey Long.

A third avenue involves all of us. We can all make clear in our behavior and our conversations that inter-group hatred is fundamentally destructive — both to individuals and to our democratic polity itself. One of quotations Gary distributed on the table last night rang a bell for me. It is the words of Martin Luther King, Jr.:

I have decided to stick with love. Hate is too great a burden to bear.

A phrase that captures the view of “a free community of equals” that seems especially powerful to me is the idea of “civic friendship”. Can we cultivate civic friendship on a mass scale?

A few years ago I had my own dream of a more just America. I imagined an alternative future for Florida through the thought of a progressive centrist governor who found a way to unite the state around a shared vision:

It could have been different. In an alternate universe Florida might have had a centrist governor who actively and eloquently endorsed the pluralism and diversity of the third largest state in the country.

“All of us — black, white, brown, Asian, Christian, Muslim, Jewish, straight, and gay — all of us constitute the dynamism and creativity of our state. Our history has sometimes been ugly, and acts and practices of racism are part of that history. We need to honestly confront our past, and we need to move forward with commitment and confidence in the strength of a diverse society. As your governor I will work every day toward ensuring equality, dignity, and participation of every member of our society. That is my pledge to you, my fellow Floridians.”

This is a winning formula for democracy, and it is a winning formula for a political party. In this alternate universe, Florida could play a key role in creating a democratic and dynamic south. But sadly, no red state seems ready for this transformation of their politics and culture.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | 1 Comment

Right-wing extremist violence is more frequent and more deadly

The reckless and dangerous claims by administration leaders, including Stephen Miller, that a vast leftist conspiracy is committing most political violence are another MAGA fabrication …. Here are the data.

Right-wing extremist violence is more frequent and more deadly

https://theconversation.com/right-wing-extremist-violence-is-more-frequent-and-more-deadly-than-left-wing-violence-what-the-data-shows-265367?utm_medium=article_clipboard_share&utm_source=theconversation.com

Posted in Uncategorized | 6 Comments

Free Speech Under Assault

The Trump Administration is engaged in a concerted campaign against Americans’ First Amendment free speech rights. Free speech is a core democratic value, directly related to human dignity, to human progress, and to the full exercise of citizenship. It is not without reason that free speech is ensconced at the beginning of the Bill of Rights. It is also worth noting that the Constitution might well not have been ratified had there not been an understanding that a bill of rights would be added. James Madison, sometimes called “the Father of the Constitution,” was a committed advocate of the bill of rights and the drafter of the amendments. When Trump and company attack free speech, they are assaulting one of the most fundamental principles of a free people.

The rapidity and sweeping nature of the attack is stunning. There is not enough space here even to touch on all of its dimensions. The catalyst, of course, is the assassination of Charlie Kirk, whose death has magically transubstantiated many on the Right who prided themselves on so-called free speech absolutism (often very shallow in form) into sudden advocates for the elimination of “hate speech” (which has long been constitutionally protected speech) . . . about Charlie Kirk. The breadth of speech that they sweep into that category is staggering — all truth be damned. And the consequences are devastating. Here is an article in The Chronicle of Higher Education that catalogs employees and students at universities and colleges who have been disciplined or suspended.  And that is just higher education.

The highest-profile case is, of course, ABC’s rapid suspension of Jimmy Kimmel, following threats by the chair of the Federal Communications Commission, Brendan Carr. Barb and I have joined the boycott and cancelled our Disney/ABC subscriptions (fortunately, we finished Andor just in time). And this is what we sent to ABC:

I am beyond disgusted that ABC has bowed to pressure from the Trump Administration and pulled Jimmy Kimmel’s show, following a statement he made on his show about the alleged shooter of Charlie Kirk and the MAGA reaction to it.  My wife and I have cancelled our subscriptions until Jimmie Kimmel is restored to the air.

FCC Chair Brendan Carr accused Kimmel of “lying,” said that you should remove him, and said it could be done “the easy way or the hard way.”

(1) Mr. Kimmel’s statement was wholly within the bounds of legitimate public discourse, even if a part of it later turned out to be incorrect based on new information.  In any case, it clearly qualifies as protected speech under the First Amendment. If the government had acted directly against Kimmel for his comments, it would be a crystal clear violation of his Constitutional rights. DO NOT DO THE GOVERNMENT’S DIRTY WORK FOR IT! That was a common tactic during the McCarthy Era: non-governmental organizations persecuting speech and speakers based on government pressure. YOU ARE HELPING DRAG US INTO A NEW MCCARTHYISM.

(2) The government DID threaten Disney/ABC directly when Carr made his threat about “doing it the easy way or the hard way.” If he acted on that threat, it would surely violate the First Amendment. Uttering the threat is in itself suspect: it is an act that chills discourse. STAND UP FOR YOUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AND THE PRINCIPLES OF FREE SPEECH, WHICH ARE AT THE HEART OF YOUR INDUSTRY AND WHICH ARE ESSENTIAL TO A DEMOCRACY.

(3) Carr accused Kimmel of “lying.” What ABC appears to be indicating is that the FCC Chair and his boss, President Trump, are the arbiters of both truth and people’s intention.  IN THAT CASE, YOU HAVE ABDICATED YOUR PUBLIC TRUST. 

(4) Public figures and institutions have demonstrated that when you stand up to the Trump Administration, you win: Governor Pritzker, Harvard University, the AP, numerous federal employees, etc. JOIN THE RANKS OF THE COURAGEOUS, NOT THE COWARDS.

(5) Trump is on a tear to destroy the First Amendment and turn federal powers against his enemies. UNLESS YOU CHANGE COURSE, YOU WILL GO DOWN IN HISTORY AS AMONG THE COLLABORATORS WHO ENDED DEMOCRACY.

Please act quickly. Much more than your salaries and assets are at stake. Your Hulu/Fubo merger approval will mean nothing in a tyranny.

Michael Tomasky in The New Republic explains why this situation is so important. And here is AOC on the floor of the House today, speaking against a resolution to “honor the life and legacy of Charlie Kirk.” And, a good analysis of the first-amendment issues here.

We are in dark times indeed, but people are still working to speak truth to power.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

President Obama’s plain words about White House anti-democratic rhetoric

Here is a great excerpt from a recent interview with former president Barack Obama … He calls out the White House pattern of using venomous language to denounce their political opponents. And he calls upon us to stand up for our democratic values, fight for democracy.

https://www.facebook.com/share/r/1BQ4GGgmmd/?mibextid=wwXIfr

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Washington Post National park to remove photo of enslaved man’s scars

Information about the history of chattel slavery contribute to “corrosive ideology”? Truly Orwellian! How far can this attack on our freedoms and our urgent need to have an honest understanding of our history go?

Democracy requires honest facing of our country’s history!

National park to remove photo of enslaved man’s scars

https://www.washingtonpost.com/climate-environment/2025/09/15/national-parks-slavery-information-removal/

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Missouri Sen. Eric Schmitt openly promoted white supremacism in a public speech • Missouri Independent

This is stunning, jaw-dropping, and so fundamentally and clearly white supremacist. Shame!

Missouri Sen. Eric Schmitt openly promoted white supremacism in a public speech • Missouri Independent

https://missouriindependent.com/2025/09/15/missouri-sen-eric-schmitt-openly-promoted-white-supremacism-in-a-public-speech/

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

“Cry ‘Havoc!’, and let slip the dogs of war”

I’ve been trying to think about what to say about Charlie Kirk’s murder. The internet is overflowing with reaction and commentary, some of it good, much of it not. As I try to digest the murder itself and its larger implications, I am stuck in a place between human reaction and political fear. 

Let’s start with the most basic truth: he was a human being whose life was wrongly taken, from himself and from his family, criminally and apparently by a young man acting on the misguided belief that an act of hate, of evil, was the appropriate response to the sort of hate that Kirk spouted — all such spoutings protected by the 1st Amendment. (That’s another issue for future discussion.) In any case, I am deeply sorry.

Kirk’s murder has been labeled an assassination, and I think that is appropriate: he was a public political figure. Jonathan Last has this to say: “Assassination goes a step further [then ordinary murder]. In addition to all of the above, assassination is, like terrorism, an attack on our body politic. An attack on how we choose to live together.” This is perhaps the most critical point: Kirk’s assassin has added to the “attack on our body politic.”

To be clear, Charlie Kirk was no saint. The New York Times has published a piece on his comments on various issues. This is not good. His politics were hate-filled and anti-democratic, and in an earlier age he would have been a marginal figure. But there is no denying that he was a key force in bringing us to the age we are in, where a person like him is not marginal. And, for me his one and only redeeming quality is that he was prepared to debate all comers. (See Ezra Klein;s piece in the Times, about which I have mixed feelings.)

So maybe we have to love the sinner but hate the sins?

Still, we are in a terrifying moment. Trump and MAGA want to use this murder to justify all kinds of attacks on democracy. And that, frankly, is the scariest part of this.

In Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, immediately after the assassination of Caesar, Marc Antony seizes the moment to grab control, using the assassination to mobilize forces in Caesar’s name and on his behalf:

And Caesar’s spirit, ranging for revenge
With Atè by his side come hot from hell
in these confines with monarch’s voice
Cry “Havoc,” and let slip the dogs of war,
That this foul deed shall smell above the earth
With carrion men groaning for burial.

“Havoc” was a military order in the middle ages and early modern period that amounted to, “Let the plundering, pillaging begin.” This seems precisely to be what Trump and company are doing with Kirk’s murder.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

Krugman on the slide to authoritarian rule

Here is a very powerful piece by Paul Krugman on the means by which wannabe dictators build their power base … even in the presence of formal democratic institutions. His view converges with Levitsky and Ziblatt, Tyranny of the Minority.

https://substack.com/@paulkrugman/note/p-173129902?r=fzsj7

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Dan Little on inclusive multicultural democracy

Our friend and fellow blogger Dan Little has a wonderful academic blog, Understanding Society, that deals with issues “in philosophy of social science and the workings of the social world.” Dan is a very clear expositor of philosophical ideas, and I think that even if you have not had philosophical training, some of his posts will be accessible to you. That is certainly true of a recent post that I think is relevant to our group’s purposes, “A political philosophy for an inclusive multicultural democracy.”

Dan writes:

Here I want to lay out the skeleton of a political philosophy incorporating the ideals of an inclusive multicultural democracy. I maintain that a stable and inclusive multicultural democracy is a positive value for the whole of society: all citizens are benefited by a varied and harmonious population of peoples with distinct traditions, values, and practices. This is a society in which there are many groups and identities in society (racial, ethnic, sexual, class, nationality), and in which members of these groups have the moral emotions of compassion and respect towards members of other groups. Difference exists without discrimination and prejudice; more fundamentally, difference exists within the context of a cohesive sense of shared community. Rather than antagonism there is friendship across groups.

Dan links this idea to the work of Martin Luther King, Jr., who advanced

the idea that citizens in a just multicultural democracy will experience the moral emotions of compassion and respect for each other. King described this as a kind of ‘civic friendship’ in which people from different groups succeed in living together harmoniously and leads them to experience a sense of goodwill and shared identity with their fellow citizens.”

I might add that it also links to deep elements in Western political theory; Aristotle, for instance, maintained that there were two virtues fundamental to a well-functioning polis or society, justice and friendship. (There are key questions about how civic friendship might operate, but let’s save them for later.)

As Dan points out, a key question from the standpoint of political theory – or more simply, how we understand what we are about in a democracy – is can, or to what extent can, the state, the government, actively work to nurture such civic friendship?

So achieving a just, stable, and cohesive multicultural democracy is a worthwhile goal. But will a well-ordered liberal democratic state have the authority — and perhaps the duty — to take measures that enhance the workings of a multicultural democracy?

The question is particularly poignant at this moment, given Trumpists’ attacks on DEI and so-called “wokeness,” and the rapid, too-often-preemptive, capitulation of universities, businesses, law firms and others on this matter. DEI might have – and I think it has had – its problems, and I might post about that in the future. But what we are seeing now is a wholesale rampage against exactly the kind of multicultural democracy that Dan is discussing.

What has been for some time the dominant theory of liberal democracy might well answer the above question about the state in the negative. In that view, “goods,” including even something like “civic friendship,” are private matters or matters for civil society, not matters for the state. The liberal democratic state’s responsibility is strictly to ensure that there is a space in which citizens can pursue their own conceptions of the good, as long as no harm is done to anyone else. Dan explores this issue in a subsequent post, “Can liberal political philosophy support anti-racism?”

One of the issues we face now is: resistance to Trump is one thing, but what comes next? In many ways we as a society through institutions like universities, governments, and businesses (motivated by markets, but still …) were moving us toward a more multicultural democracy. Now that is all under assault. When we get through this moment, how do we recover and better implement movement toward a genuine, broadly inclusive democracy?

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment